Backlog

Next up

In Progress

Done

Main Roadmap

Accounts should have the ability to add two-factor authentication (for example, with an authenticator app or hardware key) to do actions like withdraw or tip. There is currently no confirmation step when you withdraw any amount!

Las cuentas deben tener la posibilidad de añadir autenticación de dos factores (por ejemplo, con una aplicación de autenticación o una llave hardware) para realizar acciones como retirar o dar propinas. Actualmente no hay ningún paso de confirmación cuando se retira cualquier cantidad.

Añadir autenticación de dos factores

Konta powinny mieć możliwość dodania uwierzytelniania dwuskładnikowego (na przykład za pomocą aplikacji uwierzytelniającej lub klucza sprzętowego) do wykonywania czynności takich jak wypłata lub napiwek. Obecnie nie ma kroku potwierdzenia przy wypłacie jakiejkolwiek kwoty!

Dodaj uwierzytelnianie dwuskładnikowe

In Review

Add two-factor authentication

An Anonymous User

I wanted to share some feedback regarding the new desktop UI:<ul><li>URL + Slug Functionality: Previously, each game maintained its unique URL with the slug, which made sharing and navigating really straightforward. With the new UI, these URLs now redirect to the main sports page. While this works for some markets, it’s particularly problematic for the EPL and UCL markets. It would be great if the original URL+slug functionality could be retained across all sports markets.</li><li>Post-Game Interface: Once a game is over, the 3 shares button disappears, leaving only one order book visible. Restoring the full set of options post-game would improve the overall user experience.</li><li>Title Item Button: Additionally, the button that uses the title item instead of shortcodes should be returned. I once mistakenly clicked the wrong button, so having the option to use the title item is important for avoiding errors.</li></ul>These concerns are specifically related to the desktop UI, and I’m not sure about the mobile version.

Restoring https://polymarket.com/market/+Slug & Button Functionality

I think you could do a much better job in showing that someone has proposed a resolution in a market. For example, put up a badge on top below the market title or put the 2 hr timer below the buy button. Due to the UI bug, I sometimes miss this and I think it can be done much better.<img data-width="100%" data-align="left" data-featurebase-content-key="679d373eaa2c7a84356a69ff/post/67dd9c1c1ea2be00b9b5f568/0195b9a6-b9ae-77f8-b564-504d76398563/b64u-cHJvcG9zZWQtMS5wbmc.png" data-featurebase-content-filename="proposed-1.png" src="https://679d373eaa2c7a84356a69ff.featurebase-attachments.com/c/post/67dd9c1c1ea2be00b9b5f568/0195b9a6-b9ae-77f8-b564-504d76398563/b64u-cHJvcG9zZWQtMS5wbmc.png?X-Amz-Expires=3600&amp;X-Amz-Date=20260922T190000Z&amp;X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&amp;X-Amz-Credential=DO801TYC4FCVNNEKURKM%2F20260922%2Ffra1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&amp;X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&amp;X-Amz-Signature=b5a8e1afd11f01d0426b3a2473b0e4b8a352b585c815474f7e29a86e43b74330">Like one of those:<img data-width="100%" data-align="left" data-featurebase-content-key="679d373eaa2c7a84356a69ff/post/67dd9c1c1ea2be00b9b5f568/0195b9a6-fd5b-795f-96a8-dc4af8dbd431/b64u-cHJvcG9zZWQtMi5wbmc.png" src="https://679d373eaa2c7a84356a69ff.featurebase-attachments.com/c/post/67dd9c1c1ea2be00b9b5f568/0195b9a6-fd5b-795f-96a8-dc4af8dbd431/b64u-cHJvcG9zZWQtMi5wbmc.png?X-Amz-Expires=3600&amp;X-Amz-Date=20260922T190000Z&amp;X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&amp;X-Amz-Credential=DO801TYC4FCVNNEKURKM%2F20260922%2Ffra1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&amp;X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&amp;X-Amz-Signature=65cd61718b36220018ff415bbf489fb86404cab0b2c41e5bd74611712b547fca" data-featurebase-content-filename="proposed-2.png">

Why bury the fact a market has been proposed? Better visibility for the timer!

<h2>Current State</h2>Polymarket shows realized &amp; unrealized profit only for open positions (e.g., Miami Heat in NBA winner market). After closing, realized profit isn’t tracked, and there’s no event-wide total.Users can’t see:<ul><li>Realized profit post-closure.</li><li>Total profit across all markets in one event (like NBA winner).</li></ul><h2>Proposed Feature</h2>Add a summary for each event:<ul><li>Realized Profit: Total from all closed positions.</li><li>Unrealized Profit: Total from all open positions, based on current prices.</li></ul>E.g., see all NBA winner market profits in one view, directly on the Event page.<h4>Benefits</h4><ul><li>Clear performance tracking.</li><li>Better strategy for multi-market events.</li></ul><h4></h4><h4>Why It Matters</h4><ul><li>Enhances transparency and usability for complex events.</li></ul>

Event-Level Profit Summary

When you’re making an order - apart from the “bal.” showing the amount of cash that user has - there should be “free bal.” number that would show how much cash the user would have left if all of their limit orders would be filled.This way it would be easier to place orders without risking other orders being cancelled.

Adding "free balance" number

Summer Wind

I get bummed by the rampant sexism, racism and homophobia on this website. It really takes the joy out of trading to read what horrible things people are writing in the comments, especially if you're from one of the groups being talked about. Reported many times, haven't seen any improvement.If you're not going to do active moderation, could we at least get a block button so I can take matters in my own hand and hide repeat offenders myself? That would improve things at least somewhat.

Block button against sexism/racism/homophobia

<ul><li>Please add the MLB games (First games of the season starts in less than 7 hours) MLB will probably be one of the biggest volume drivers now as there´s no NFL and the NBA season is closing in.</li><li>Sort games on “Live/Soon” by starting time, not competition (If you only want to bet on one competition you´d just go to “NBA” for example).</li><li>Add a “Football” section where you consolidate all football (Some may call it soccer) games into one place, so it´s easier to navigate. Very hard to keep track of what La Liga, Serie A, Nations League, WCQ, FA cup etc. games you’re offering when you have to check every competition individually + “other” and only a handful of the games are added.</li><li>Saw you tried to add handicaps and over/under lines for NBA on Monday. Think it can be very successful, but the offerings need visibility. I suggest showing the line closest to evens on the main pages of “NBA” and “Live/Soon” and the remaining lines when you press “Game View”.</li><li>There´s a lot of good requests in the Discord channel “Sports-suggestions” that I think you should take into account more frequently. Requested markets are rarely added and if they are it´s often late, take today’s MLB games as an example. </li></ul>

Please add today´s MLB games + some Sports related requests

autist.eth

It would be great if there is a possibility to arrange markets that are on your watchlist in any order you’d like by dragging them with your mouse or assigning numbers to them

Free arrangement of Watchlist markets

SPUTNIK

What would you think of the Idea ?: that users have vaults where they can store money (just like on Stake gambling website).. or even multiple portfolios in one account e.g. users can make one for scalping, for risky bets, for daily markets or weekly narkets etc., It helps with money management and also if multiple portfolios are implemented with market managment. Idea by @dkarp/polymarket: a simpler and more feasible version of this is just having the option to group markets in your watchlist/portfolio. separating bankroll is a bit more tricky

Portfolio Management

Scraping and archiving Polymarket and UMA discussions, especially from Discord, gives light to serious concerns of collusion. When determining clarifications, Polystaff reserve themselves almost exclusively for a small and consistent group of users. Those users describing themselves (in congruence with evidence) as UMA voters, market influencers, and high volume participants on Poly. In public conversation, these users explicitly deride objectivity, celebrate their ability to resolve markets arbitrarily, and rationalize insider-priority (securing profits) to justify capricious clarification campaigns and market resolutions. These conversations remain publicly available to read, at the time of this submission. These conversations are happen in the presence of UMA and Polymarket staff.Multiple markets have been impacted by the situation described above. At this moment, I’m observing (as a non-stakeholder) “Will Trump create Bitcoin reserve in first 100 days?”, a market publicly described as being dominated by UMA and Poly insiders. Multiple attempts to resolve this market have resulted in oracle failure, while insiders successfully persuade Polystaff not to issue any clarification. Meanwhile, the conditions of this market:"This market will resolve to "Yes" if the US government holds any amount of Bitcoin in its reserves at any point between January 20, 2025, ET and April 29, 2025, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No"."The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the US government and/or the US federal reserve, however a consensus of credible reporting will also be used."-have been overwhelmingly satisfied for resolution, evidenced by the highest official sources within The United States Government, including The White House, The President, The Crypto Czar, and politicians from both major parties. Also evidenced by multiple well known attorneys, world leading chain-analysis platform Akrham, and an overwhelming consensus of credible reporting: including Associated Press, BBC, Wall Street Journal, NPR, Reuters, Bloomberg, CNBC, and over a dozen other leading platforms.

OSI Researcher concludes evidence of collusion.

The old notifications of creation of new markets were quite useful, but also quite messy. My suggestion: put it back, but dont insert one notification for each bracket, just for a whole market (example: dont put 1 notification for each elon musk tweet bracket from 450-900, just show that the market as a whole has been created) and also create a subdivision between buy/sell notifications and the market creation ones

Planned

Notifications

I propose to improve liquidity rewards in order to change the situation where the bot hides its limit order “behind” other users. To address this problem, I see two options: <ul><li>Offer an additional percentage yield for the order that is first in line, to provide motivation and fairness for being at the front.</li><li>If a user places an order, then cancels it and reissues it at the same price, they would not receive rewards for a certain period (for example, 30-60 minutes)</li></ul>

Enhancement of the rewards program

CryDev1l

Add a channel dedicated to new sports markets in the discord 🙏

#new-sport-markets channel

1. More Transparency on When Markets Are Clarified or Not At the moment, there is often ambiguity on when a market will be clarified by Polymarket or go unimpeded through the UMA dispute process. If Polymarket has a stance on how a market should resolve, they should issue a rules clarification. If Polymarket does not want to intervene or does not have a strong opinion, then they should clarify:“This market’s outcome will be decided by the decentralized UMA Oracle” Do this for every dispute. This allows for transparency and less trader confusion on who will choose the winning outcome. We should also avoid situations where markets are suddenly clarified after several UMA disputes or after UMA voting has already concluded.2. Time Window for Clarifications To add to #1, there should be set timeframes during which rules clarifications are issued, and guidelines published on the platform. For instance, clarifications more than 12-18 hours into an UMA commit period should be avoided as this is too late for UMA voters to decide or change their votes. If Polymarket is dedicated to clarify beyond that timeframe, they must commit to pausing resolution on the market, and if necessary, emergency resolving the market. Otherwise, they should simply not clarify.&nbsp;Polymarket should also have dedicated staff who are active on the weekends and available to issue clarifications or escalate any possible market concerns. 3. Earlier / Preemptive ClarificationsOftentimes, traders bring to light rules issues days or weeks in advance and request a rules clarification to elucidate areas of obvious ambiguity. However, these requests are typically ignored, with clarifications only issued after weeks of trading and a dispute being filed in UMA. The Polymarket Team should not shy away from immediately addressing rules issues, even if it seems unlikely that they will be a problem. It’s better to patch up possible disputes before they occur, rather than waiting to see if they become an issue.

1. Больше прозрачности в отношении того, когда рынки уточняются или нет В настоящее время часто возникает неопределенность в отношении того, когда рынок будет разъяснен Polymarket или пройдет через процесс споров UMA. Если у Polymarket есть своя позиция по поводу того, как должен разрешаться рынок, они должны выпустить разъяснение правил. Если Polymarket не хочет вмешиваться или у него нет четкого мнения, то он должен дать разъяснения:"Исход этого рынка будет определяться децентрализованным UMA Oracle". Делайте это для каждого спора. Это обеспечит прозрачность и уменьшит путаницу между трейдерами в вопросе о том, кто будет решать исход спора. Мы также должны избегать ситуаций, когда рынки внезапно проясняются после нескольких споров UMA или после того, как голосование UMA уже завершилось.2. Временное окно для разъяснений В дополнение к № 1 следует установить сроки, в течение которых выпускаются разъяснения правил и публикуются рекомендации на платформе. Например, следует избегать разъяснений более чем через 12-18 часов после окончания периода фиксации UMA, так как это слишком поздно для участников голосования UMA, чтобы принять решение или изменить свой голос. Если Polymarket намерен провести разъяснение за пределами этого периода, он должен взять на себя обязательство приостановить решение по рынку и, если необходимо, провести экстренное решение по рынку. В противном случае они должны просто отказаться от разъяснений.В Polymarket также должны быть выделены сотрудники, которые будут активны в выходные дни и смогут дать разъяснения или эскалировать любые возможные проблемы рынка. 3. Заблаговременные / упреждающие разъясненияЧасто трейдеры сообщают о проблемах с правилами за несколько дней или недель до начала торгов и просят разъяснить правила, чтобы прояснить очевидные неясности. Однако эти запросы обычно игнорируются, и разъяснения появляются только после нескольких недель торговли и подачи спора в UMA. Команда Polymarket не должна уклоняться от немедленного решения вопросов, связанных с правилами, даже если кажется маловероятным, что они станут проблемой. Лучше устранить возможные споры до их возникновения, а не ждать, пока они станут проблемой.

Совершенствование и переработка системы разъяснений / руководящих принципов

Completed

Improving and Revamping the Clarification System / Guidelines

Sports is something that is proven to bring significant volume that isn’t for a one off event. See exchanges like Betfair, which does millions of volume on many matches daily. However the polymarket sports experience leaves much to be desired:<ul><li>For some inexplicable reason, the sports page loads every market even when selecting a specific league (for example, selecting NBA has the client render every single market for every sport which causes significant delays when navigating the website). It isn’t uncommon to be using 1-2GB of RAM on polymarket tab alone.</li><li>Games are added very late or not at all. It is critical to automatically add games at least 1 day in advance consistently for market makers to bother investing in providing liquidity. Right now many large events are posted last minute (sometimes hours before the event), completely missing (such as many large tennis tournaments, NCAAB games), or incomplete (UFC cards get added with missing fights for some reason). </li><li>There should be more options than just winner. At the minimum a spread and over/under would bring significant volume based on Betfair market volumes</li><li>Many sports has every game show up as a prop match. This makes it incredibly hard to find games and navigate the site. Example: CBB</li></ul>Polymarket sports has a lot of potential and should be a significant priority. If done right can be a legitimate competitor to betfair. However it is critical to make the UI seamless and consistently post games at least 1 day in advance. This is a requirement if you want market makers to even bother providing liquidity on this site.

Make sports the #1 priority

Define a process where it is clear to users whether a vote will be decided by polymarket clarification, or UMA vote. Clarify early as possible, and if you decide not to clarify, let users know that UMA will decide the outcome. This will provide traders a lot more predictability with markets. Right now, it is a mess where UMA will rule one way, but maybe poly will issue a clarification the other way. On top of this, poly’s clarifications are very inconsistent. Sometimes they are in the spirit of the law and other times in the letter of the law. But this would be less bad if they were done early, and/or could be ruled out early.

Transparent clarification process

On markets that are in denominations of 0.1c, make the ± buttons increase or decrease the limit price by 0.1c rather than 1c. The + / - buttons essentially lose all purpose. I.e. suppose best bid is 4.1c, ask is 4.3c. If I want to place a buy at 4.1c, the screen initially sets it to 4.3, and rather than let me click the - button twice, I have to manually type in the price.

Change +/- functionality

Optional, hidden by default. You can also take example from poker clients where you set your own size - 1bb, 2bb, ALL IN etc.. Besides numbers, you can use percentages too - 25,50,75 etc

Reinstate max limit buy button

when you write a comment under a market and type "/" (slash), you open the search box for some reason and continue typing there, very annoying

"/" (slash) in market comments transfers you to search box

Bit naggy but could you chance the amount of shares to
16,482.00? 

It is pretty hard to figure if its 1,234 or 12,345 or 123,456 sometimes.

Maybe just get rid of the .00 if you have more than 100 shares?

Update positions tag for large amounts: remove decimal and add comma

digitdustin

There is a bug in the new created bitcoin markets<img data-width="100%" data-align="left" data-featurebase-content-key="679d373eaa2c7a84356a69ff/post/68027a7ffca55d72f31aca86/019649ae-73fe-7935-a349-80501fe66e66/b64u-U2NyZWVuc2hvdCAyMDI1LTA0LTE4IGF0IDE5LjEzLjM4LnBuZw.png" src="https://679d373eaa2c7a84356a69ff.featurebase-attachments.com/c/post/68027a7ffca55d72f31aca86/019649ae-73fe-7935-a349-80501fe66e66/b64u-U2NyZWVuc2hvdCAyMDI1LTA0LTE4IGF0IDE5LjEzLjM4LnBuZw.png?X-Amz-Expires=3600&amp;X-Amz-Date=20260922T190000Z&amp;X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&amp;X-Amz-Credential=DO801TYC4FCVNNEKURKM%2F20260922%2Ffra1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&amp;X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&amp;X-Amz-Signature=e33b88c04e7da393c0cf14d45acf4f7cf31a051fd2a6d3aa04444e52a214e15a" data-featurebase-content-filename="Screenshot 2025-04-18 at 19.13.38.png">: two equal markets and if you choose second “April 20“ it leads to Etherium one.